Home › Forums › Polyamory & Relationships › *Stickied* Primary & Secondary Relationships
- This topic has 45 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 10 years, 4 months ago by Pegglind.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 27, 2014 at 10:25 pm #2180Answashe87Participant
I prefer not to use such terms but rather call people by their current roles in my life.
Like this … X is my co-writer and boyfriend, Y is my husband and we own property together, etc. Who’s primary? Primary in what regard??? Y is primary when it comes to helping me decide kitchen renos, X when it comes to plot-lines, Y when it comes to decisions about electronics, X when I want to talk about social issues etc. etc. other people I’m not even in romantic/sexual relationships with are primary in other ways.
Let the chips fall where they may …
April 1, 2014 at 5:25 pm #2181GrevinatMemberI don’t use terms like that. I have a boyfriend(my other half) and normally a girlfriend. They are my partners. Each has an importance in my life and they know they both have to respect each other. Honestly we label to much now adays. Love is love 🙂
April 5, 2014 at 6:02 pm #2182LibitatheMemberI am in the first year of my first poly D/s triad. I’m not a fan of using labels, but if we don’t use them, how do I get introduced to their friends? in this situation, it would really help define our convoluted multi-level dynamics among the three of us. They would help sort out the ambiguity of our roles.
April 9, 2014 at 1:12 am #2183PannourParticipantBoth Zenocrate and TomatoBoobs have a similar vein of thought to mine. The partners I have dedicated to for life have decided, on their own, how they want to be introduced by me to others. Even though I have had a ceremony with both individuals, the person I am married to on paper is my “spouse”. My other partner is my “significant other”. I can’t label one as more primary than the other because we make decisions as a family; not two couples.
April 15, 2014 at 3:12 am #2184ThessalkyMemberI have a wife of 20+ years, a girlfriend of 10+ years, and have had several girlfriends/lovers over the last 30+ years. I can only remember a ~6 month period in my dating life when I was NOT poly, and that’s a story for another day/thread.
I love my wife and girlfriend equally. My offspring (Through wife) are in adulthood now, and have enjoyed seeing my girlfriend as well as her (recent) husband when she or they came by. It was an honor to be a member of their wedding party.
I’m not a fan of these labels either. I don’t believe that my girlfriend uses them either. At least, I haven’t heard her or her husband do so. After such a long time together, perhaps we don’t need to? She has always been my girlfriend and I her boyfriend. And our spice (Plural of spouse?) are either husband or wife accordingly.
What I would love to read, however, are stories from others about reactions and how introductions have been given to friends and family? (Obviously, from those who are already “Out” to these people.)
In my case, we are not out only with one set of family out of the four. It is a little tough on the one whose family is “In the dark”, but unfortunately, necessary. 🙁 Everyone else has had their own reactions to the news when it came, but all have seem to come to except it. Many have openly praised it.
April 18, 2014 at 11:12 am #2185SomparkMemberI’m happy with not having a primary in my life, and have been using the terminology secondary to refer to my lover(s).
But this seems inadequate, as if my choice to not have a primary is somehow lesser, which is not how I feel.
In this thread there is a reference to alternative terms, domestic and feral. I really like these, and will start to use feral as the form of poly I am interested in exploring. Does any one else relate to these terms, I’ve never come across them before?BTW, I REALLY like the idea of being feral with my poly lovers 🙂
April 24, 2014 at 2:43 pm #2187Relly1960ParticipantI’ve been finding that I do use the term “primary” sometimes to refer to my girlfriend, who I’ve been with for longer, used to be monogamous with, and with whom I’m raising a child. What I like about the term is that it lets others know she’s not my only partner, and since we’re not actually married it’s more technically accurate than calling her my wife. But I don’t refer to my boyfriend as my “secondary” partner; I just call him my partner or my boyfriend. I don’t like the hierarchy that the terms primary/secondary imply, and I try not to invite that level of categorization into our lives.
April 24, 2014 at 3:12 pm #2186AptantionMemberFrankly, I would be offended if I was called the domestic and another partner called the feral. It would make me feel worse than just being called secondary.
May 1, 2014 at 4:26 am #2188Ount1982MemberI hate the term primary and secondary and i do my best not to use them. I find it easier to either call them by there names or by there hair color when im talking about them to another person.
May 5, 2014 at 7:21 pm #2189ThoillodyParticipantI personally find myself in the same situation as garden peach in that I am not married to my primary , and we used to be monogamous and are razing a child together. I prefer no labels …..but she is comforted by knowing she is my primary or main relationship… I don’t really like secondary though sometimes have used it as a descriptor. My other relationship was with a married woman who I referred to as my friend for years with off again on again great sex. once she tried labeling it as something more and my friend got jealous and possessive ruining the whole thing including the friendship which makes me really sad. But I think my friends bad relationship with her husband may have had a lot to do with it though.
definitely wish there were better words than primary and secondary though one obviously stayed when there became conflict between the two
May 9, 2014 at 7:11 pm #2190SaidinParticipantI have not used those terms but realistically that is what the relationships were all about. Both relations were where she pursued others on a regular basis, in other words each of my marriages were that way where she/they could date men as they wished. I chose not to date others but still had some liaisons where me and certain men would engage in adventures, so that is why I am saying we had primary (each one of us was our primary) and secondary relationships were where she exercised her right for extra marital (what some would call them) relationships. We both enjoyed the fact we were not indulging in situations where we had to hide things from the other or lie one to the other. I hope this helps in the discussion.
May 15, 2014 at 10:12 pm #2191IntentookeyParticipantDo you use these terms?
No, I don’t. I’m just not into relationship hierarchies.
I have a partner that I spend 3-5 nights a week with, and have been with him for a little over a year. I spend time with his son and we communicate daily.
I was in a LDR when we first started dating and for the majority of our relationship. I’ve since started casually dating other people.
I’ve valued all of these relationships equally and none of them have ever had more of a priority in my life.
Do you have any opinion about other people using them?
From my perspective, having a primary partner is a way to exert control because of insecurities about being “replaced” or feel threatened. Every relationship is different and play a different role in a person’s life. No need to create hierarchies.
May 29, 2014 at 1:26 pm #2192OblingMemberI am poly and I use primary and secondary titles just as anither member stated….not only to differentiate the level of entanglement but my level of priority and commitment … my primary girlfriend and I share a home…my secondary is in another state and one in another city
June 8, 2014 at 12:18 pm #2193WitundMemberMy FWB and I are talking about finding a third. He has a fetish for Asian and I am a vanilla white girl. I could handle being like a “sister” not sure about joining in… probably be more of a non married version of a sister wife, and I think it would be important to establish that if push came to shove, this girl comes first…over the fetish and everything else. The idea of a “toy” sounds intriguing, but I don’t know that I could over the long haul treat someone like they were nothing more than a plaything and not acknowledge a very human attachment. People get attached, fact of life…why temps get cut off if they start talking about relationships…
June 17, 2014 at 10:12 pm #2194HillectParticipantI dont much care for the terms but I understand their use in establishing a commonly easily understandable concise method of communicating meaning regarding something which can be complex to convey using other terms such as partner, boyfriend, girlfriend, lover etc.
I think my objection comes from the value which seems to go with the terms; that primary is more important and secondary sounds like some kind of afterthought. My relationship in a triad is not an equal one. In that they are married to each other, live together and although we share each other, enjoy shared time and intimacy together, I am very much separate to their unit together. However I don’t consider myself secondary in terms of value. Our relationship with each other as individuals is different and different again from our relationship together as a three.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.